🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to restart nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations was effective, and shared fresh requests had come from mediators to resume discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is treading a complex course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, European countries used their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the deal to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations restart.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of global regulations, Araghchi said the 12-day war showed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He asserted the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had always tried to dictate their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and stays the final resolution to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the identical approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be restored; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have become stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the aftermath of this assault."